The Elder Scrolls 6: The Problem With Essential NPCs

Not so essential NPCs.

Posted By | On 20th, Nov. 2016

skyrim-beast-wallpaper

A friend of mine recently got the Skyrim remaster, and they really got into it. They had played for almost 50 hours, and were on their way to Platinuming the game, with every intent to invest hundreds of hours into the game beyond that. However, it then turned out that an essential NPC, who gives the player character a quest for a Daedric artifact, was dead- that NPC had been killed by a vampire at some point over the game, and owing to the state of permanence in Bethesda RPGs, they stayed dead. My friend couldn’t get that last Daedric artifact, couldn’t Platinum the game, got discouraged at this, since this was no fault of theirs, and gave up on the game.

This highlights an issue in Bethesda’s games- see, the big reason that they are as popular as they are is that they allow you to do anything, at any time, anywhere in the game, and what you do sticks. Nothing is off limits in an Elder Scrolls game, no character that you can’t kill, no place that you can’t go to. This mix of openness and permanence is what makes these games so compelling.

But on the other hand, as the example above demonstrates, there is clearly a downside to this, as even ‘essential’ characters, needed to progress the story, can sometimes die, leaving the player with no way to progress, or get certain quests done. This is one thing that Bethesda need to address in The Elder Scrolls 6– how do they offer the kind of openness that they are known for, while also not potentially stranding players in the game with no ways to progress?

Some ways to implement this might be making certain characters unkillable, as an example, until certain checks are passed (for instance, until the character has given the player the quest or item that they are supposed to). Alternately, Bethesda could implement a backup, where every major or essential quest or item in the world reverts to a dungeon or hidden location in the world that the player must find if the character who was supposed to give it to them otherwise dies prematurely- this would still be frustrating, but at least affected players would have a backup, and it would be in line with the series’ penchant for openness and exploration.

Whatever Bethesda do, they should not ignore the issue. It’s not big enough to affect most players- but those that do can get disenfranchised with the entire series, given enough time.


Amazing Articles You Might Want To Check Out!



Share Your Thoughts Below  (Always follow our comments policy!)



Keep On Reading!

Diablo 4 Trailer Hypes Upcoming Open Beta

Diablo 4 Trailer Hypes Upcoming Open Beta

It goes live for everyone from March 24th to 27th, but pre-orders gain early access from March 17th to 19th, w...

Star Wars Jedi: Survivor Director Wants to Make a Third Game

Star Wars Jedi: Survivor Director Wants to Make a Third Game

Respawn's Stig Asmussen "always wanted to see this as a trilogy," and development on Unreal Engine 5 is a "pre...

The Coalition Hiring in 13 Senior Roles, Likely for Gears 6

The Coalition Hiring in 13 Senior Roles, Likely for Gears 6

The lead mission designer will help "forge the future of the IP and push the limits of Microsoft’s entertain...

Hi-Fi Rush Surpasses 2 Million Players

Hi-Fi Rush Surpasses 2 Million Players

Tango Gameworks' acclaimed rhythm action game has surpassed 2 million players in a little over a month.

The Wolf Among Us 2 Delayed to 2024

The Wolf Among Us 2 Delayed to 2024

"We're committed to delivering the sequel fans deserve and doing what's right for the game while protecting th...

The Wolf Among Us 2 Has Switched to Unreal Engine 5

The Wolf Among Us 2 Has Switched to Unreal Engine 5

Having started development in 2020 on Unreal Engine 4, Telltale confirms its highly anticipated sequel recentl...